🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.